<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why we should EVEN have Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s back&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:45:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denise C</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-17953</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-17953</guid>
		<description>I admit that when I received the email alert on having Pelosi&#039;s back I cringed in horror.  I appreciate the explanation, and do agree that it&#039;s better to be principled and consistent than emotionally dance you deserve it you deserve it - but I confess it wasn&#039;t my first reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit that when I received the email alert on having Pelosi&#8217;s back I cringed in horror.  I appreciate the explanation, and do agree that it&#8217;s better to be principled and consistent than emotionally dance you deserve it you deserve it &#8211; but I confess it wasn&#8217;t my first reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When the Rubber Meets the Road : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-17232</link>
		<dc:creator>When the Rubber Meets the Road : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 01:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-17232</guid>
		<description>[...] been a hot topic here and elsewhere lately:  why did The New Agenda bother to defend Nancy Pelosi, who went out of her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been a hot topic here and elsewhere lately:  why did The New Agenda bother to defend Nancy Pelosi, who went out of her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I am Piper Smith&#8230;You are Piper Smith&#8230;. : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-17068</link>
		<dc:creator>I am Piper Smith&#8230;You are Piper Smith&#8230;. : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-17068</guid>
		<description>[...] heard me preaching about unity on our blog here and here. And I&#8217;m going to keep going and try to win over women and like minded men one by one and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] heard me preaching about unity on our blog here and here. And I&#8217;m going to keep going and try to win over women and like minded men one by one and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16995</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-16995</guid>
		<description>And if the men who degraded her get a taste of OUR medicine, maybe THEY&#039;ll think twice.  Which is more important to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if the men who degraded her get a taste of OUR medicine, maybe THEY&#8217;ll think twice.  Which is more important to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna darko</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16993</link>
		<dc:creator>donna darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-16993</guid>
		<description>Janis, don&#039;t ever shut up. 

The idea is if Pelosi et al get a taste of their own medicine &lt;a href=&quot;http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2009/05/naral-uneasy-about-sotomayor.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;like NARAL is getting right now&lt;/a&gt; maybe they won&#039;t sell out women next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janis, don&#8217;t ever shut up. </p>
<p>The idea is if Pelosi et al get a taste of their own medicine <a href="http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2009/05/naral-uneasy-about-sotomayor.html" rel="nofollow">like NARAL is getting right now</a> maybe they won&#8217;t sell out women next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16991</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-16991</guid>
		<description>Also (sorry, I&#039;ll shut up someday, I suppose) -- if you say that you are in effect willing to tolerate that rabid dog in your neighborhood because it occasionally gives you the pleasure of biting someone you don&#039;t like ... you&#039;re &lt;i&gt;trusting the dog to tell the difference!&lt;/I&gt;  Holy crap on a cracker, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also (sorry, I&#8217;ll shut up someday, I suppose) &#8212; if you say that you are in effect willing to tolerate that rabid dog in your neighborhood because it occasionally gives you the pleasure of biting someone you don&#8217;t like &#8230; you&#8217;re <i>trusting the dog to tell the difference!</i>  Holy crap on a cracker, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16989</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-16989</guid>
		<description>donna, I despise Brazilezebub, too.

BUT I DESPISE SEXUAL DEGADATION MORE.  What&#039;s higher on your outrage scale?

Seriously.  Do we really hate women who cave more than we hate men who rape?  Are we holding women to tougher standards than we&#039;re holding men to?  Are we more willing to forgive a man for sexually humiliating a woman than we&#039;re willing to forgive a woman for being an asshole?  What are our standards, here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>donna, I despise Brazilezebub, too.</p>
<p>BUT I DESPISE SEXUAL DEGADATION MORE.  What&#8217;s higher on your outrage scale?</p>
<p>Seriously.  Do we really hate women who cave more than we hate men who rape?  Are we holding women to tougher standards than we&#8217;re holding men to?  Are we more willing to forgive a man for sexually humiliating a woman than we&#8217;re willing to forgive a woman for being an asshole?  What are our standards, here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16988</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-16988</guid>
		<description>mslas, if you don&#039;t &quot;stick up&quot; for even women you don&#039;t like when they are attacked in a sexist way, you ARE sticking up for ... well, not to put too fine a opint of it, you are sticking up for rape.

You okay with that?

You&#039;re saying sexism and sexual humiliation are okay &lt;i&gt;in some instances&lt;/i&gt;.  You&#039;re the government acting like you want to eradicate smallpox when you&#039;re really keeping a little vial of it around in case it might come in handy.

You&#039;re saying that you&#039;re happy to have a rabid dog roaming your block because, occasionally at random, it bites people you don&#039;t like.  Might it someday bite you as well?  Sure -- but that&#039;s a risk yuo&#039;re willing to subject yourself, your kids, and people you &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; like to, in order to take visceral pleasure in the suffering of people you don&#039;t like.

You enjoy watching some bitch get hers so badly that you&#039;ll let a rabid dog run loose that threatens everyone?  Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mslas, if you don&#8217;t &#8220;stick up&#8221; for even women you don&#8217;t like when they are attacked in a sexist way, you ARE sticking up for &#8230; well, not to put too fine a opint of it, you are sticking up for rape.</p>
<p>You okay with that?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re saying sexism and sexual humiliation are okay <i>in some instances</i>.  You&#8217;re the government acting like you want to eradicate smallpox when you&#8217;re really keeping a little vial of it around in case it might come in handy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re saying that you&#8217;re happy to have a rabid dog roaming your block because, occasionally at random, it bites people you don&#8217;t like.  Might it someday bite you as well?  Sure &#8212; but that&#8217;s a risk yuo&#8217;re willing to subject yourself, your kids, and people you <i>do</i> like to, in order to take visceral pleasure in the suffering of people you don&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>You enjoy watching some bitch get hers so badly that you&#8217;ll let a rabid dog run loose that threatens everyone?  Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Siskind</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16983</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Siskind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-16983</guid>
		<description>LOL donna!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL donna!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna darko</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2009/05/27/why-we-must-even-have-nancy-pelosis-back/comment-page-1/#comment-16981</link>
		<dc:creator>donna darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=9890#comment-16981</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll let stronger stomachs prevail if Brazile is attacked.

This Pelosi business is more serious than this silly attack. Democrats and Republicans want her out of the way so Obama can do what he was elected to do, cut Social Security.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://lolfed.com/2009/05/23/quick-to-the-printing-press/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;We are out of money now&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/may2009/ssmd-m14.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cuts in Social Security, Medicare to pay for bank bailouts&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll let stronger stomachs prevail if Brazile is attacked.</p>
<p>This Pelosi business is more serious than this silly attack. Democrats and Republicans want her out of the way so Obama can do what he was elected to do, cut Social Security.</p>
<p><a href="http://lolfed.com/2009/05/23/quick-to-the-printing-press/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;We are out of money now&#8221;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/may2009/ssmd-m14.shtml" rel="nofollow">Cuts in Social Security, Medicare to pay for bank bailouts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
