The New Agenda - a voice for all women
Get Involved: Become a Member | Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
    • Contact Us
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
Home » Women's History

What Every Woman Should Know About the 19th Amendment

March 16, 2009

by Anna Belle PfaucloseAuthor: Anna Belle Pfau Name: Anna Belle Pfau
Email: peacocksandlilies@gmail.com
Site: http://annabellep.wordpress.com/
About: See Authors Posts (48)

|
8 Comments
  • Email
  • Share
  • Tweet

What Every Woman Should Know is a bi-weekly series on American Women’s History. The series is weekly in March, which is Women’s History Month. This article has been edited from an original version, which was posted here.

The 19th Amendment

The final push for elective franchise for women is one of the most riveting tales in American history. As Harriot Stanton Blatch said after the Amendment was ratified:

All honor to women, the first disenfranchised class in history who, unaided by any political party, won enfranchisement by its own effort alone and achieved the victory without the shedding of a drop of human blood.

Advancing from the West

For the first 15 years of the 20th century, suffragists had been working on a state-by-state strategy to win universal suffrage. The idea was to campaign for suffrage using new Western states, many of which granted women the right to vote in state elections, as examples to build a consensus state by state to allow women to vote. Once all the states allowed women to vote, surely the national government would have to concede the national vote as well, they reasoned. They were successful in getting suffrage for women in many western states before the final push came, and it is fair to say that the hard work of these western women in some ways helped make passage of the amendment possible.

Alice Paul and Lucy Burns thought the state-by-state plan would take too long, and the only way to effectively accomplish the rest of the goals of the women’s movement was to achieve full, national, and immediate suffrage rights for women. Radicalized in England under the influence of Emmeline Pankhurst, Alice Paul returned to the United States in 1910 to join the fight for women’s equality. Six years later, frustrated by American Suffragist’s state-by-state strategy, Paul and Burns formed the National Women’s Party. With the NWP they began to employ some of the more radical tactics they had learned in England. They staged parades, mass meetings, and hunger watches, among other, sometimes even criminal, undertakings. The parades are what most people remember, and the image that made its way into the history books.

suffrage-ny-paradeSilent Sentinels

At the same time, Paul and her allies began to heavily criticize Woodrow Wilson and the Democratic Party for paying lip service to an Amendment they would not take up. The following year, shortly after Wilson was sworn in, Paul began to stage protests outside the White House. The participants called themselves “Silent Sentinels for Liberty” and held up signs demanding the vote for women. They protested every day, except Sunday, for more than two years, even after Wilson voiced support for the amendment.

silent-sents

That same year, the United States joined the fight in World War I. Once war was declared, public, physical attacks on the Sentinels began to occur. The women refused to relent against the argument that the nation was at war, and women should wait some more. A series of arrests ensued over the next few months, and each time women chose jail time over paying fines. Alice Paul was arrested in October of 1917, and sentenced to seven months for obstructing sidewalk traffic. Paul and many other Silent Sentinels were sent to Occoquan Workhouse in Virginia. There Paul began the hunger strike that nearly cost her life, but which ultimately helped give us the right to vote.

Alarmed at the state of their health, prison officials began to force feed several Sentinels who were striking. With the women strapped down to restrict their movement, sometimes prison officials used a tube to force liquid into their stomachs, sometimes they forced maggot-infested oatmeal or soup into their mouths, then held them closed. Alice Paul had lived through similar force-feedings in England when she had worked with British Suffragists, and thought this new attack was a turning point, as it had been there. But what happened next makes Blatch’s quote at the top of this diary partially untrue. While it’s not often discussed, blood did indeed spill.

Night of Terror

On November 15, 1917, the Warden of Occoquan Workhouse in Virginia ordered his guards on what is now known as the Night of Terror.

On that night, forty prison guards, police clubs in hand, went on a rampage against the 33 women convicted of “obstructing sidewalk traffic.” They beat Lucy Burn, chaining her hands to the cell bars above her head and left her hanging for the night, bleeding and gasping for air. They smashed Dora Lewis’ head against an iron bed and knocked her out cold. Her cellmate, Alice Cosu, thought Lewis was dead and suffered a heart attack. Additional affidavits describe the guards grabbing, dragging, beating, choking, slamming, pinching, twisting and kicking the women.

The details of the Night of Terror were the last straw. Public outrage and opposition had been building as news slowly leaked that there were hunger strikes and forced feedings, but everything boiled to a head after the Night of Terror. Everyone, from ordinary folks to politicians in Washington, began to talk about the women and their plight. Demands issued from many quarters that the women be released, which they finally were, on November 27th and 28th of 1917, many after nearly half a year in prison, most in very poor health.

suffragettes2

In January of 1918, Woodrow Wilson announced his support for the Susan B. Anthony Amendment, and Congress voted on it soon thereafter, failing the 2/3 majority test by two votes. American women campaigned vigorously that election year to unseat anti-suffragist incumbents, and were successful. The amendment passed the following year, 1919, by a landslide, and began to make its way around the country to be ratified.

War of the Roses

By the summer of 1920, 35 states had ratified the 19th Amendment, and 36 were needed for it to become an official part of our founding document. It came down to Tennessee, and a War of Roses during the dog days of summer. Both pro- and anti-suffrage factions from across America made their way to Nashville to duke it out over votes in the Tennessee legislature. Members of the opposing factions and politicians wore yellow roses to show their support for suffrage, and red roses to show their opposition to suffrage.

On August 18th, amidst a sea of red and yellow roses, the roll call for votes went out, and came back 2 votes shy. Another roll call was made, and this time, Rep. Banks Turner crossed the line to the suffrage side. One vote shy. A third, and final roll call was made, and this time, a young man by the name of Harry Burn, wearing a red rose, crossed over to the suffragists side. Pandemonium ensued.

With his “yea,” Burn had delivered universal suffrage to all American women. Outraged opponents to the bill began chasing Representative Burn around the room. In order to escape the angry mob, Burn climbed out one of the third-floor windows of the Capitol. Making his way along a ledge, he was able to save himself by hiding in the Capitol attic.

When he was later questioned as to why he had voted for it, despite wearing a red rose, he explained that what people saw was the red rose on his jacket, but they didn’t see that in the pocket behind it was a telegraph from his mother in East Tennessee. It read:

Dear Son: Hurrah, and vote for suffrage! Don’t keep them in doubt. I noticed some of the speeches against. They were bitter. I have been watching to see how you stood, but have not noticed anything yet. Don’t forget to be a good boy and help Mrs. Catt [Carrie Chapman Catt] put the ‘rat’ in ratification. Signed, Your Mother.
~Febb Ensminger Burn

***

The 19th Amendment was certified as law by Wilson’s Secretary of State, Bainbridge Colby on August 26, 1920. Bainbridge Colby was a founding member of the United States Progressive Party.

The young women of today-free to study, to speak, to write, to choose their occupation–should remember that every inch of this freedom was bought for them at a great price… the debt that each generation owes to the past, it must pay to the future.
~ Abigail Scott Dunaway

Sources:

Why Women Vote

Blue Shoe Nashville

Wikis:

Harriot Stanton Blatch

Emmeline Pankhurst

Alice Paul

Lucy Burns

Carrie Chapman Catt

Bainbridge Colby

8 Comments »

  • Ali said:

    Anna Belle, I cried yet again while reading this. It’s hard not to!

    Before learning about Alice Paul the events that led to the 19th amendment (I learned about this from you and “Iron Jawed Angels”), I think I had imagined that women gained the right to vote because society was ready for it. I could not have imagined the drama and sacrifice… We owe these women a lot.

    Just the other day I purchased an “A to Z” picture book about important women. I was annoyed that “A” was for “Amelia” versus Alice Paul. There was not one suffragette in the book. I’m not saying it’s not a nice book…. but still, this story of the 19th amendment is under told.

    Thank you for your inspiring essays, Anna Belle. Your series are a favorite of mine on this blog.

    March 16, 2009 at 11:52 am
  • Anna Belle (author) said:

    Thanks, Ali. This story never has gotten the airplay it’s needed. If people knew this story, they could clearly draw paralells with what they already understand to be injustice. But nobody cares about it for some reason. In all my years in WH, people just love love love EC Stanton and Anthony, but Alice Paul, eh, not so much. I was pretty surprised and thrlled when Iron Jawed Angels came out.

    Thanks for the compliment on the series. I’m glad you’re liking it.

    March 16, 2009 at 8:09 pm
  • marille said:

    Hi Ali and Anna Belle, I love Anna Bell’s series too.
    We (me and my daughter ) cried too, when we say “iron jawed angles”.
    The story is clearly undertold, without Alice Paul brilliant strategical thinking and sacrifice and Lucy Burns support I don’t think we would have the vote today.
    Alice Paul is clearly my favorite. Inez Mulholland my daughter’s. The beautiful lady on the horse representing Columbia and giving her life for the cause.
    Re children books. I bought my daughter “remember the ladies” by Cheryl Harness published in 2001 by Harper Collins.
    Alice Paul and the hunger strike is mentioned briefly.
    We also watched the PBS movies “not just or ourselves” on E. Cady Stenton and Susan B. Anthony (very nicely done) and “one woman one vote” which also includes the final push, but I think, does not give enough credit to Alice Paul.
    there is a “scholastic” issue with a play in womens history on Alice Paul. I don’t know in which grade and which schools use it.
    Also there is a republican congress woman Michelle Bachman from Minnesota, who tried to get a congressional medal for Alice Paul, but was voted down.

    the scene from the movie where Alice Paul very sick is interviewed by the psychiatrist and asked for a reason for protest is always bringing me to tears. with a fading voice she explains how she is in so many ways just like the man interviewing her, she has a heart , a brain , needs freedom …
    she does not say we need the vote because with women in congress the world would be better like so many others did and linking our cause to prohibition. which brought the alcohol mafia to finance the opposition. later on she thought the fight for the ERA should not be linked to anything. i fear it has been linked to abortion rights, GLBT rights and of course we have the right financing the opposition. to use the word sex instead of gender in the ERA is really unfortunate.

    March 16, 2009 at 9:10 pm
  • Anna Belle (author) said:

    Marille, I’ve noticed your comments on other posts as well, and it always brings a smile to me when I see you talking about sharing this interest with your daughter. That is the way, I swear it! Teach the children, start them young, and they will change the world for us. I believe that with every fiber of my being.

    March 16, 2009 at 9:23 pm
  • Adrienne Grey said:

    “The young women of today-free to study, to speak, to write, to choose their occupation–should remember that every inch of this freedom was bought for them at a great price… the debt that each generation owes to the past, it must pay to the future.
    ~ Abigail Scott Dunaway”

    Amen. Sadly, this old saying can be applied to many young women:
    They were born on third base and think they hit a triple.

    *****A

    March 16, 2009 at 11:31 pm
  • Ali said:

    Marille,

    Thanks for sharing all the materials that you have found. That is really interest about Michelle Bachman. I will tell my friend from Minnesota!

    Anna Belle,

    Knowledge of women’s history… It gets even worse than you may think. I didn’t even know who Elizabeth Cady Stanton was before coming to New Agenda. And I haven’t quizzed all my friends and family like I have with Alice Paul but I can say that I have asked a few and who do not know Elizabeth Cady Stanton, either. The only suffragette I had ever heard of was Susan B.

    March 17, 2009 at 8:59 am
  • Cynthia Ruccia said:

    Tears here too. Wow!! What a story.

    I kept thinking as I read it of how so many women think that if we just put up the “right” kind of women, more women will get elected. In the end, we will have to do more than that to achieve parity. Read my post for tomorrow “Why Women Don’t Run For Office,” and you will see that we will need to do more than just hope for the best. We need to be deadly smart and as daring as Alice Paul to achieve our ends. Why do we need to do it? It’s simple—–we need to continue paying it forward for future generations….

    Won’t it be wonderful to listen to young women 20 years from now talk about the bad old days when women weren’t in parity in government, didn’t get paid as well as men, and didn’t ever have a female president to look up to. For them it will be like the dark ages—–but only if we pay it forward.

    March 17, 2009 at 2:39 pm
  • Carolyn said:

    You are right Cynthia. We have been creeping forward during the past 90 years, but I think the time has come for a leap. Picking apart every issue as to whether a female candidate is “feminist enough” or not is only going to divide our cause. Let’s get women elected first, then apply pressure if and when it is needed.
    We can’t wait around forever for “perfect” female candidates. Besides, I happen to think we might be surprised how bold some of these women will become on our behalf when they are liberated from having to play by the rules of the male politicians. Let’s have faith in our sisters!

    March 17, 2009 at 5:10 pm

Leave your Response

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Join Our National Movement »

Supporting women.
Ending sexism.
Finding common ground.

  • Become a Member
  • Get Email Alerts
  • Volunteer With Us

We’re in the Media »

Click to see our latest stories in the media

More Stories »

    Recent Comments

    • Janis: Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?
    • Bes: Are We the Women of Mad Men?
    • Lynne Spreen: Are We the Women of Mad Men?
    • Swannie: Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?
    • yttik: Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?
    • Kathleen Wynne: Are We the Women of Mad Men?

    The Latest from our Blog

    • Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?
    • Are We the Women of Mad Men?
    • How Feminists’ Eggs Came Home to Roost
    • Constructive Feminism and the Third Wave
    • Best City for Working Women: In Our Checkbooks

    Archives

    Blogroll

    • Afrocity
    • Amazing Women Rock
    • Conservatives4Palin
    • Elect Women Magazine
    • Equal Visibility Everywhere
    • Equal Writes
    • Femisex
    • Hardy Girls Healthy Women
    • Jack & Jill Politics
    • Jenn Q. Public
    • Marketing the Muse
    • MomsRising
    • NewsReal Blog (Feminist Hawks' Nest)
    • No Quarter USA
    • Peacocks and Lilies
    • Smart Girl Nation
    • Still4Hill
    • Stray Yellar Dawg
    • Taylor Marsh
    • Tennessee Guerilla Women
    • TexasDarlin
    • The Confluence
    • The Red Pump Project
    • The Stiletto
    • The Vyne
    • Uppity Woman
    • What About Our Daughters
    • WOMENomics

Find the New Agenda Online

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Flickr

Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...

  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Contact Us