The New Agenda - a voice for all women
Get Involved: Become a Member | Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
    • Contact Us
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
Home » Uncategorized

If “This is What a Feminist Looks Like” (see below), is NOW now open to a male president?

January 10, 2009

by The New AgendacloseAuthor: The New Agenda Name: agenda
Email: editor@thenewagenda.net
Site: http://thenewagenda.net
About: See Authors Posts (370)

|
32 Comments
  • Email
  • Share
  • Tweet
John Edwards - NOW's new president?

John Edwards for NOW president

This Spring, the National Organization for Women will choose a replacement for Kim Gandy. Here are The New Agenda’s suggestions for potential candidates. Please weigh in with your own.

John Edwards – a true family man
Chris “Tinglepants” Matthews – he knows how to talk to the girls
Elliot Spitzer – he’s feminist enough to pay for extramarital sex instead of just coercing it from an aide (a girl’s gotta make a living, after all)
Rick Warren – because women need a man’s firm hand to guide them
Bernard Madoff – needs a new job, good with money
Lawrence Summers – girls don’t know anything about math, he can help
Maureen Dowd – a rare example of sisterhood

Only those cutting edge journalists at the Onion saw it coming:

53-year-old management consultant Peter “Buck” McGowan took over as new chief of the worldwide initiative for women’s rights… McGowan claimed that one of the main reasons the movement enjoyed so little success in the past was that the previous management was often too timid and passive and should have been much more results-focused.

“You can’t waste time pussyfooting around with protests and getting all emotional about a bunch of irrelevant details,” McGowan said. “If you want to enjoy equal rights, you have to have a real man-to-man chat with the people in charge until you can hammer out some more equitable custody laws.”

“And don’t get me started on how disorganized and scatterbrained their old fundraising methods were,” McGowan added. “Let’s just say the movement never really had a head for numbers.”

32 Comments »

  • NMK said:

    Oooooooooh. Good one. Where’s Chris Tweety Matthews and Olbermann. And so many others, but this is a good start.

    But I’m still confused. Is this about women, or is it about media bias and touting Obama under the influence of koolaid. Puzzling, isn’t it?

    January 10, 2009 at 10:01 pm
  • Amy Siskind said:

    When does OJ get out?

    January 10, 2009 at 10:04 pm
  • NMK said:

    OJ. Cutting edge.
    HIram Montserrate. Another cutting edge guy.

    January 10, 2009 at 10:06 pm
  • Lisa said:

    Oooooh! One of my VERY favorite a**holes, Bill Mahr!

    January 10, 2009 at 10:17 pm
  • KayJL said:

    how about Peter Griffin from Family Guy? he’s had sensitivity training.

    January 10, 2009 at 10:22 pm
  • Amy Siskind said:

    Alec Baldwin – he’s good on the phone.

    January 10, 2009 at 10:35 pm
  • Thia, GA said:

    Tucker Carlson! May he keep his legs crossed so he doesn’t pollute the gene pool! :D

    January 10, 2009 at 10:57 pm
  • Octogalore said:

    Favreau, baby! He knows how to make the right overtures to important women.

    January 10, 2009 at 11:09 pm
  • KayJL said:

    Howard Dean–he needs a job

    January 10, 2009 at 11:16 pm
  • ANa said:

    NOW has lost all credibility. If you ask me, they are an embarrassment now a days. They should be shut down.

    January 10, 2009 at 11:32 pm
  • KendallJ said:

    I appreciate the satire in this, but I think we really need to focus on changing NOW and some of these other Feminist organizations. I think bashing them is just dividing women who need each other. The work that needs to be done will require a united front. It doesn’t make sense to through the baby out with the bath water. I hope that we can set up a summit for feminist groups to come together and find common ground. This has been discussed on chewing the phat with Ophelia. I think it’s a good idea.

    This Ms. Magazine thing is just a PR disaster. It is a real slap in the face to women who are angry about how Hillary Clinton and even Sarah Palin were treated this campaign season. Obama gained big time as a result of sexism and misogyny toward both of these women. Furthermore, he has not acted like a feminist, so to brand him this way is insulting.. That being said, I am shocked and miffed as to why Ms. Magazine has done this.

    January 10, 2009 at 11:32 pm
  • Amy Siskind said:

    Kendall,

    Totally agree. We need these organizations. Perhaps under new leadership, NOW will thrive and return to its roots. Hope springs eternal.

    TNA continues to attend meetings and work with many organizations…including NOW at a DC coalition meeting this past week.

    We just thought tonight that every one could use a little fun to blow off some steam. It has been quite a week.

    January 10, 2009 at 11:39 pm
  • Thia, GA said:

    KendallJ,
    One more thought, how will NOW et al. ever change if nobody tells them they need to? Under the current leadership they obviously think they are right on track. Hopefully they will make some changes but we all have to point out what we think they are doing wrong. (if you think they are wrong that is) I like doing it with satire and humor better than being snotty.

    January 10, 2009 at 11:49 pm
  • Sheryl Robinson said:

    I thought we were making fun of Ms. Magazine.

    NOW is a diverse organization, with state and city chapters all over the country. I know that National NOW endorsed Obama, but I wouldn’t write an obit for the entire organization just yet.

    January 10, 2009 at 11:53 pm
  • Thia, GA said:

    Sheryl,
    Good point about chapters. I keep forgetting they had dissenting opinions in state and local chapters.

    January 10, 2009 at 11:57 pm
  • Cynthia Ruccia said:

    how about that rapper—-”I got 99 problems and a bitch ain’t one”—he’s so poetic….

    January 11, 2009 at 12:03 am
  • Sheryl Robinson said:

    James Carville – knows what the important issues are.

    January 11, 2009 at 12:04 am
  • Amy Siskind said:

    I think that we need to give it to Maureen Dowd.

    Imagine the opening line of her acceptance speech:

    “Thanks for selecting me. All you women s*ck.”

    January 11, 2009 at 12:13 am
  • KendallJ said:

    Thia,

    I totally agree with you about letting NOW, etc, know what they are doing something wrong. I can also understand taking a mental break with the satire. I guess I just don’t want to completely ailianate them.

    Amy,

    I am glad that TNA is communicating and working with NOW. I agree that NOW needs an injection of new blood, but the institution still has a lot of potential and organization. They are diverse and there is talant to be realized in some of the local chapters. I hope that we can help some of this talant make its way into the leadership of the national organization.

    January 11, 2009 at 12:39 am
  • Thia, GA said:

    I’ve changed my mind. I want the guy who had the sign about Hillary that said something like “If she couldn’t satisfy her husband, she won’t satisfy the country.”

    What a waste of meat!

    January 11, 2009 at 1:01 am
  • KayJL said:

    let’s all chip in and get Maureen Dowd a reading from John Edward, so she can contact Dorothy Parker and get some real wit.

    January 11, 2009 at 1:01 am
  • Thia, GA said:

    KayJL-very clever!

    January 11, 2009 at 1:12 am
  • KendallJ said:

    Did anyone notice that Donna Brazile in a columnist for Ms. Magazine. Yes, the women who sat there on CNN and didn’t say a word while several others on the panel she was sitting on discussed why it was OK for “some” women to be called bitches.

    January 11, 2009 at 4:42 am
  • KendallJ said:

    Talk about having the fox gaurd the chicken coop!!! MS. MAGAZINE HAS REALLY GONE OFF THE DEEP END..

    January 11, 2009 at 4:45 am
  • Stray Yellar Dawg said:

    My feeling is one of betrayal.

    Ms. Mag was like a mother to me in the 80’s… and now that she has a shiny new boyfriend…. she is turning her eyes away from the abuse her daughters have endured at his very own hands.

    I am just sick. I suppose I’ll spend a few days blogging about it… trying to “get over it.”

    http://syd4.blogspot.com/2009/.....aried.html

    January 11, 2009 at 7:25 am
  • KayJL said:

    The Donald…because Mr. Tinglepants needs to be FIRED.

    January 11, 2009 at 2:20 pm
  • Ms Placed Democrat » Obama Is A Fraud, Not A Feminist said:

    [...] The New Agenda: If “This is What a Feminist Looks Like” (see below), is NOW now open to a male president? [...]

    January 12, 2009 at 3:34 pm
  • Constance said:

    NOW lives in it’s own little world. You can’t alienate them because they never come up for air and they won’t know what anyone else is thinking or saying about them. Their web site is not interactive, you can’t even reach them. If they didn’t have such contempt for housewives they could hire a few to reorganize their fund raising and their priorities so they could get off the race issues, gay issues, transgender issues, hate crime for everything but crimes against women issue, etc, etc, etc and actually focus on WOMEN’S ISSUES. Catholic school mothers are amazing fund raisers. I very much appreciate the jokes and humor. That is one thing that has been sadly missing from the Feminist movement.

    January 12, 2009 at 7:04 pm
  • fsteele said:

    Humor is one reason I love PUMA! It was born in humor, at the moment when we most needed it:c.May 31. Anger/frustration/stifled-voices bursting out in the humor of “Party Unity My Ass!” at Riverdaughter’s. A term that quickly spread, a name for feelings that many had but no way to name them.

    Puma has been a first-response with humor ever since. When the Favreau groping photo first came out, a few serious people condemned it — but some Puma sites instantly photoshopped the photo and spread the satirical versions.

    Here’s a quote that may pre-date the naming of Puma, but it’s the same feeling:

    That the women are beginning to have a good time
    is an especially bad sign for Barack Obama’s campaign.
    — Froma Harrop

    January 12, 2009 at 8:25 pm
  • Anna said:

    fsteele

    I remember Ms. Harrop’s comment:

    “That the women are beginning to have a good time
    is an especially bad sign for Barack Obama’s campaign.”
    — Froma Harrop

    I loved it and I loved her writing last year.

    If only her prediction had proved true……

    January 12, 2009 at 9:18 pm
  • therio said:

    Why have a NOW organization anyway, barry is solving everything, right?

    January 13, 2009 at 11:58 am
  • BAC said:

    What purpose does it serve in the advancement of women’s rights to throw an entire group of women under the bus?

    The rights currently enjoyed by the women participating in this discussion were secured by the very women you are now bashing. How “feminist” is that?

    And if you don’t like how NOW is being run, then organize your supporters and take it over! It is, after all, a grassroots movement.

    Anytime we spend time pointing a finger of blame sideways is a distraction from pointing our finger at the true cause of our problems — the patriarchy. (Which at the moment is above us.)

    BAC

    January 15, 2009 at 6:21 pm

Leave your Response

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Join Our National Movement »

Supporting women.
Ending sexism.
Finding common ground.

  • Become a Member
  • Get Email Alerts
  • Volunteer With Us

We’re in the Media »

Click to see our latest stories in the media

More Stories »

    Recent Comments

    • Bes: Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?
    • Janis: Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?
    • Bes: Are We the Women of Mad Men?
    • Lynne Spreen: Are We the Women of Mad Men?
    • Swannie: Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?
    • yttik: Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?

    The Latest from our Blog

    • Rolling Stone Cover: Sexist, Pornographic, or What?
    • Are We the Women of Mad Men?
    • How Feminists’ Eggs Came Home to Roost
    • Constructive Feminism and the Third Wave
    • Best City for Working Women: In Our Checkbooks

    Archives

    Blogroll

    • Afrocity
    • Amazing Women Rock
    • Conservatives4Palin
    • Elect Women Magazine
    • Equal Visibility Everywhere
    • Equal Writes
    • Femisex
    • Hardy Girls Healthy Women
    • Jack & Jill Politics
    • Jenn Q. Public
    • Marketing the Muse
    • MomsRising
    • NewsReal Blog (Feminist Hawks' Nest)
    • No Quarter USA
    • Peacocks and Lilies
    • Smart Girl Nation
    • Still4Hill
    • Stray Yellar Dawg
    • Taylor Marsh
    • Tennessee Guerilla Women
    • TexasDarlin
    • The Confluence
    • The Red Pump Project
    • The Stiletto
    • The Vyne
    • Uppity Woman
    • What About Our Daughters
    • WOMENomics

Find the New Agenda Online

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Flickr

Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...

  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Contact Us