<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Together We CAN Make a Difference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:50:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hannah Cushing</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Cushing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>I have known Ezra for a couple of years. When I heard that one of his videos had blown up into a huge controversy, I asked him to see the video. 
Ezra knows me to be a feminist with strong opinions and who is not afraid to say what I think. 
While I can agree that some of his humor is a quite tasteless, it is just that - humor. It was immediately clear to me that the video was satirical. I interpreted it to be taking on not only political issues but also the kind of rap video after which it was modeled.
When I read the blogs and outrage blown far our of proportion my first reaction was to think, &quot;these people have clearly never seen a rap video before.&quot; 

Ezra&#039;s work is SATIRICAL. Quite a bit of gangster rap is not. If you want to believe something is dangerous, take a look at the music of the masses - the music your kids are listening to on the radio. 

Dr. Dre&#039;s &quot;Housewife&quot; for example.
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1Ecbeq514c  

When Ezra asked me what I thought about his video, I was in the process of trying to find music videos to analyze in my class using feminist literary theory. That week Britney Spear&#039;s &quot;Womanizer&quot; was #1 on the charts. I told him that I didn&#039;t find his video as insulting as I found &quot;Womanizer.&quot; 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZSLIq6YiRY 
This is more insidious evil. It professes to be empowering to women. But we are creating more double standards. Change the gender roles in the video and this video would provoke mass outrage. I think true feminists are fighting for equality, not preferential treatment. 
In addition, Britney spends a good deal of time naked and writhing in a sauna. Then putting herself in provocative positions with men all the while saying &quot;no.&quot; Then we wonder why men don&#039;t get it when we say &quot;no.&quot; Our society teaches that &quot;no&quot; means &quot;maybe later.&quot; We teach our girls to play these &quot;hard to get&#039; games that men must attempt to decipher.
 
Let&#039;s fight something worth fighting against rather than a satirical music video by a local artist. Fight the Top 40 brought to you every week by Clearchannel. Fight sexual trafficking of young girls. Fight the marketing of Swiffers sweepers exclusively to females. Fight the unattainable images of physical perfection for our daughters. Fight for equality not preferential treatment. 

But for god&#039;s sake, have a sense of humor. This is how feminists get a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have known Ezra for a couple of years. When I heard that one of his videos had blown up into a huge controversy, I asked him to see the video.<br />
Ezra knows me to be a feminist with strong opinions and who is not afraid to say what I think.<br />
While I can agree that some of his humor is a quite tasteless, it is just that &#8211; humor. It was immediately clear to me that the video was satirical. I interpreted it to be taking on not only political issues but also the kind of rap video after which it was modeled.<br />
When I read the blogs and outrage blown far our of proportion my first reaction was to think, &#8220;these people have clearly never seen a rap video before.&#8221; </p>
<p>Ezra&#8217;s work is SATIRICAL. Quite a bit of gangster rap is not. If you want to believe something is dangerous, take a look at the music of the masses &#8211; the music your kids are listening to on the radio. </p>
<p>Dr. Dre&#8217;s &#8220;Housewife&#8221; for example.<br />
 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1Ecbeq514c" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1Ecbeq514c</a>  </p>
<p>When Ezra asked me what I thought about his video, I was in the process of trying to find music videos to analyze in my class using feminist literary theory. That week Britney Spear&#8217;s &#8220;Womanizer&#8221; was #1 on the charts. I told him that I didn&#8217;t find his video as insulting as I found &#8220;Womanizer.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZSLIq6YiRY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZSLIq6YiRY</a><br />
This is more insidious evil. It professes to be empowering to women. But we are creating more double standards. Change the gender roles in the video and this video would provoke mass outrage. I think true feminists are fighting for equality, not preferential treatment.<br />
In addition, Britney spends a good deal of time naked and writhing in a sauna. Then putting herself in provocative positions with men all the while saying &#8220;no.&#8221; Then we wonder why men don&#8217;t get it when we say &#8220;no.&#8221; Our society teaches that &#8220;no&#8221; means &#8220;maybe later.&#8221; We teach our girls to play these &#8220;hard to get&#8217; games that men must attempt to decipher.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s fight something worth fighting against rather than a satirical music video by a local artist. Fight the Top 40 brought to you every week by Clearchannel. Fight sexual trafficking of young girls. Fight the marketing of Swiffers sweepers exclusively to females. Fight the unattainable images of physical perfection for our daughters. Fight for equality not preferential treatment. </p>
<p>But for god&#8217;s sake, have a sense of humor. This is how feminists get a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>I mean this is no disrespectful way but after watching the said video I must say that the video in no way refers to violence, sexual or otherwise, against women.  I hope that by stating that my comment isn&#039;t taking off but after seeing the video it seems to obviouslly be well within the boundries of satire or humor, tasteless as it may be.  It seems rather un-american to attack someone else&#039;s free speech over what is essentially a harmless video made by some harmless college student.

here is a link with an interview with the man behind the video;

http://filmthreat.com/index.php?section=interviews&amp;Id=1218

all respect, Zach Hoffman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean this is no disrespectful way but after watching the said video I must say that the video in no way refers to violence, sexual or otherwise, against women.  I hope that by stating that my comment isn&#8217;t taking off but after seeing the video it seems to obviouslly be well within the boundries of satire or humor, tasteless as it may be.  It seems rather un-american to attack someone else&#8217;s free speech over what is essentially a harmless video made by some harmless college student.</p>
<p>here is a link with an interview with the man behind the video;</p>
<p><a href="http://filmthreat.com/index.php?section=interviews&amp;Id=1218" rel="nofollow">http://filmthreat.com/index.ph.....mp;Id=1218</a></p>
<p>all respect, Zach Hoffman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: After the Election: Our Real Work Together Begins : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>After the Election: Our Real Work Together Begins : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 02:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>[...] Our pre-election journey has been shaped by unforeseen factors. First, Senator McCain picked the Republican Party&#8217;s first female Vice Presidential Candidate. Within 48 hours, The New Agenda issued a press release that we would act as a watchdog organization for all female candidates. Shortly thereafter, we were again pinged into a new direction as NOW chose to endorse an all male ticket for the first time in the history of the organization: we were again compelled to speak out. Before we could catch our collective breathe, the misogyny against Gov. Palin grew to disturbing proportions. The New Agenda, at this point a nationwide effort, was pinged again and this time our members worked together to speak out and bring about change against a sexist article in Slate, a misogynistic video, and a video of Gov. Palin being knocked unconscious. In all three cases, through our work together, change occurred and we reported: Together We CAN Make a Difference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Our pre-election journey has been shaped by unforeseen factors. First, Senator McCain picked the Republican Party&#8217;s first female Vice Presidential Candidate. Within 48 hours, The New Agenda issued a press release that we would act as a watchdog organization for all female candidates. Shortly thereafter, we were again pinged into a new direction as NOW chose to endorse an all male ticket for the first time in the history of the organization: we were again compelled to speak out. Before we could catch our collective breathe, the misogyny against Gov. Palin grew to disturbing proportions. The New Agenda, at this point a nationwide effort, was pinged again and this time our members worked together to speak out and bring about change against a sexist article in Slate, a misogynistic video, and a video of Gov. Palin being knocked unconscious. In all three cases, through our work together, change occurred and we reported: Together We CAN Make a Difference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So It&#8217;s a Woman Thing &#171; Conservative Pilgrim</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>So It&#8217;s a Woman Thing &#171; Conservative Pilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>[...] out The New Agenda: a new non-partisan group for women’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out The New Agenda: a new non-partisan group for women’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexist Video of Governor Palin knocked unconscious and Reebok disavows! &#171; GretaWire</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexist Video of Governor Palin knocked unconscious and Reebok disavows! &#171; GretaWire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>[...] Greta Van Susteren   I was tipped off to a website that has been identifying and fighting sexism (click here.) The group and their website is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Greta Van Susteren   I was tipped off to a website that has been identifying and fighting sexism (click here.) The group and their website is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Siskind</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Siskind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>Great work all!

This is terrific.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work all!</p>
<p>This is terrific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samanthasmom</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>samanthasmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very pleased with Reebok&#039;s response and have taken my sneakers out of the trash. What next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very pleased with Reebok&#8217;s response and have taken my sneakers out of the trash. What next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcattorney</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>dcattorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>Great work Samanthasmom!    Reebok has &quot;disavowed&quot; the video.  I&#039;m satisfied with Reebok&#039;s response.  Are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work Samanthasmom!    Reebok has &#8220;disavowed&#8221; the video.  I&#8217;m satisfied with Reebok&#8217;s response.  Are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samanthasmom</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>samanthasmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>And from Reebok:
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Diane Zappas
Date: Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Subject: Reebok Response
To: _________

Dear _________,

Thank you for your note. We appreciate your interest and, yes, we’re well aware of this new video. However, let me reassure you that Reebok International has no connection today to Lester Speight or his fictional alter-ego, ‘Terry Tate’, and we disavow this personal new video and its content in full.

The confusion, regrettably, arises from our former association with the ‘Terry Tate’ character. In 2001, Reebok licensed the ‘Terry Tate’ character for a series of commercials, on a short-term basis – and our connection then ended. Reebok, therefore, does not control use of the character or the commercials. Any use of the ‘Terry Tate’ character today or in the future, therefore, does not reflect the views of Reebok, and we regret any confusion this might cause.

In fact, Reebok has a long and proud history of supporting women’s health and fitness. In 2006, Reebok announced its partnership with the Avon Walk Around the World for Breast Cancer. A series of walks to raise funds for breast cancer research, the walk has seen more than 50 cities worldwide raise awareness and money for this important cause. We’re proud of this sponsorship, and believe this more accurately reflects Reebok’s brand values – and views – in regards to women.

Thank you again for your inquiry.

Diane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And from Reebok:<br />
———- Forwarded message ———-<br />
From: Diane Zappas<br />
Date: Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM<br />
Subject: Reebok Response<br />
To: _________</p>
<p>Dear _________,</p>
<p>Thank you for your note. We appreciate your interest and, yes, we’re well aware of this new video. However, let me reassure you that Reebok International has no connection today to Lester Speight or his fictional alter-ego, ‘Terry Tate’, and we disavow this personal new video and its content in full.</p>
<p>The confusion, regrettably, arises from our former association with the ‘Terry Tate’ character. In 2001, Reebok licensed the ‘Terry Tate’ character for a series of commercials, on a short-term basis – and our connection then ended. Reebok, therefore, does not control use of the character or the commercials. Any use of the ‘Terry Tate’ character today or in the future, therefore, does not reflect the views of Reebok, and we regret any confusion this might cause.</p>
<p>In fact, Reebok has a long and proud history of supporting women’s health and fitness. In 2006, Reebok announced its partnership with the Avon Walk Around the World for Breast Cancer. A series of walks to raise funds for breast cancer research, the walk has seen more than 50 cities worldwide raise awareness and money for this important cause. We’re proud of this sponsorship, and believe this more accurately reflects Reebok’s brand values – and views – in regards to women.</p>
<p>Thank you again for your inquiry.</p>
<p>Diane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V. Hutson</title>
		<link>http://thenewagenda.net/2008/10/22/together-we-can-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator>V. Hutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1284#comment-1598</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this.  I just sent a couple emails myself to the college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this.  I just sent a couple emails myself to the college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
